WHO's Bunia prison Ebola unit made outbreak control an institutional-capacity story [1][2][3]

This is a new thread for the paper, so the first job is to separate the governing record from the argument already forming around it.

The MSM frame is straightforward: health officials are building isolation capacity inside a prison. The X frame is sharper and less patient: Ebola is either panic fuel or proof institutions cannot cope. The paper's read is narrower. Screening, isolation, lab waiting time, TB overlap, and spillover risk are the operational record.

That matters because the public decision is no longer about whether the topic feels important. It is about which document, docket, table, filing, warning, vote, or operating record should control the next claim. The source stack gives the reader multiple anchors rather than one headline. [1][2][3]

The remaining gap is practical. Outcomes for inmates, staff, and surrounding communities remain the next receipts. Until that gap closes, the responsible headline is a receipt check, not a victory lap.

-- NORA WHITFIELD, Chicago