CDC's June 26 outbreak page tells travelers to avoid nonessential travel to Ituri, North Kivu, and South Kivu in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, says risk to the U.S. public and travelers remains low, and reports no associated U.S. case. A July 10 archive capture preserves that guidance. [1]

The paper's account of the DRC treatment trial and testing machinery argued that response capacity mattered more than a death milestone; for people returning from affected parts of the DRC or Uganda, CDC converts that system-level judgment into a personal rule to monitor for symptoms for 21 days. [1]

That calendar keeps two risks in proportion because Wednesday's report on measles exposure near World Cup venues found a measurable domestic threat and an MMR task, not grounds for border panic about Ebola.

WHO's July 3 notice reports 20 confirmed Ugandan cases, including two deaths, as of July 2: 15 imported cases and five secondary cases among contacts and health workers in Kampala and Wakiso, with no documented community transmission and no new case since June 21. CDC's earlier page described all Ugandan diagnoses as occurring in Kampala and the last reported case as tied to DRC travel; WHO's newer two-district account is the controlling geographic record. Neither source concerns the separate Marburg file. [1][2]

"Low risk" therefore means a bounded task based on travel history, named places and time rather than no task at all, with the 21-day watch giving returning travelers a usable rule without treating every Kampala diagnosis as wider Ugandan transmission, while no verified independent media report or X post adds a separate frame to the CDC and WHO guidance.

-- KENJI NAKAMURA, Tokyo