Tesla shares ended Thursday's regular session down 13.5 percent, while the paper's July 22 earnings report kept present vehicle results separate from Robotaxi operations and Optimus production; the completed close prices uncertainty without filling either operating column. [1]

The Guardian combines weak profit, Elon Musk's politics, spending on artificial intelligence, Robotaxi risk, and Optimus promises in its account of the fall, factors that may each matter to valuation without proving how much weight investors assigned to any one, while the fetched record lacks an official closing-price dataset, volume, peer controls, or identifiable flows. [1]

Robotaxi requires its own denominator of fleet size, autonomous miles, human interventions, collisions, fares, utilization, geographic limits, insurance, and remote-operations cost, while Optimus needs units, production yield, tasks completed, customers, delivery dates, capital spending, and margin; a share price can value expectations about those businesses before they produce revenue without substituting for their performance.

One market session can rationally revise the odds attached to a distant promise while also reflecting rates, oil, broad technology selling, or political risk alongside company disclosures; the 13.5 percent decline is real, but a verdict that Robotaxi or Optimus has succeeded or failed remains unsupported until machines produce auditable work and accounts.

-- DAVID CHEN, Beijing