Reuters named Chinese demand destruction among the reasons crude is not already above 100. [1] A buffer is not peace. Print the buffer. Do not print a break. Bypass routes and non-OPEC supply sit in the same file. They are not a Vienna cut.

Position 5 already named the approach. This page is the China clause. Leave a later 100 to Wednesday. An unmapped zone is not a quota. OPEC's Sunday hold is not a Tuesday sheet.

Print the buffer. Tuesday is not a break above 100. Demand destruction is a clause, not a freeze. Leave a later 100 to Wednesday. Print the buffer as the named Tuesday China hold. A Reuters clause is still not a freeze. Print the approach, not a close.

Chinese demand destruction is the market's favorite shock absorber: bearish thesis on demand, bullish shield on price. Reuters' clause explains why 100 waits. Tuesday holds below it.

Held belows hold; Tuesday holds below. Holding is the buffer. Wednesday decides the close.

Approaches aren't closes; Tuesday holds below 100. Demand destruction is the shock absorber. Reuters named the clause.

Chinese demand destruction is the market's favorite shock absorber. Reuters' clause explains why 100 waits. Tuesday holds below it.

Tuesday's tape still sits in the nineties. Chinese demand destruction is why 100 waits. Wednesday owns the close that hasn't printed.

Reuters named demand destruction as the shock absorber. Tuesday's tape holds below 100. A close is Wednesday's if it prints.

Tuesday's tape still sits in the nineties, not at 100. Tuesday's tape holds below 100. Chinese demand destruction is why 100 waits.

-- DAVID CHEN, Beijing