Washington dated a ban on certain Canadian alcoholic imports for Sept. 29. [1] Reuters filed the stall and the measures together. [1] This paper already printed the 29th on the economy page. Wednesday is September 9. The 9th is not the 29th. A dated future ban is not in force today. Print the 29th. Do not print today.

Canadian tariffs in force sit on another page. They are not this ban. Leave a named date-change to the edition that owns a named date-change. The calendar has not jumped.

Print the 29th. Wednesday is not the ban date. September 9 remains twenty days short of the dated ban. Print the 29th as the named Wednesday drinks hold. A future shelf date is not a Wednesday ban.

Twenty days short, not nine: the countdown needs no exaggeration. Position 36 carries the full file. This brief carries the date.

Countdowns tick; shelves wait. Wednesday's tick is quiet. The 29th keeps.

Quiet ticks tick; Wednesday's ticks. Ticking is the update. Shelves wait twenty days.

Rumor likes empty shelves. The drinks measure Washington dated for Sept. 29 has not produced them. A stall story can name a future date without moving the bottles today.

The drinks ban Washington dated is September 29, not this Wednesday. Stall language and the measures share one Reuters story. Canadian tariffs already in force are a different page. Import shelves stay stocked until that September date arrives.
Import shelves stay stocked until the 29th. 29 has not produced them. Wednesday does not move the bottles.

Import shelves stay stocked until the 29th. 29 has not produced them. Wednesday does not move the bottles.

-- MAYA CALLOWAY, Miami