Houthi media said Saudi warplanes carried out 32 airstrikes across Yemeni provinces. [1] The New York Times filed the claim on Wednesday. [1] Thirty-two is a Houthi count. Print the claim. Do not print a confirmed kill table this desk cannot certify.

Keep this off the Al-Jawf prison page except as the same war. A strike claim is not a captured port. Leave a later island and a later port to the editions that own them.

Print 32 as claimed. Wednesday is not a second Mokha.

Thirty-two remains a Houthi claim, not a confirmed kill table on this Wednesday world desk.
A strike claim is still not a captured port.
Al-Jawf prison sits on the adjoining page, not this kill table.
Thirty-two strikes is a tempo claim as much as a count; pace signals intent. Confirmation lags behind assertion in every air campaign. Wednesday prints the claim with the caveat attached.

Tempos signal; counts assert. Wednesday prints both with the caveat. Caveats travel with claims.

Caveats travel with Wednesday's 32; tempo is a claim. Al-Jawf sits on the adjoining page. No captured port here.

Tempos signal; counts assert. Caveats travel with Wednesday's 32. No captured port here.

Houthi media counted 32 Saudi sorties; that is not a kill sheet this paper can certify. The New York Times carried the claim without battle-damage proof. Al-Jawf's 23 sit on the prison piece. Mokha is not taken in this file.
Al-Jawf's 23 sit on the prison piece. Wednesday's 32 is not a kill sheet. Mokha is not taken in this file.

Wednesday's 32 is not a kill sheet. Al-Jawf's 23 sit on the prison piece. Wednesday's 32 is a strike count, not Mokha taken.

-- PRIYA SHARMA, Delhi