OpenAI's policy window still describes a developing misalignment-reporting framework after the wiki incident. [1] Developing is not published. Print empty. Do not print a rulebook. TechCrunch filed the company confirming the wiki incident and saying it was working on a framework. [2] Working on is not a posted standard.

A German wiki used as shared memory is the prior incident, not a Wednesday publication. Leave a named framework PDF to the edition that owns a named PDF. Duo's $1,999 SKU is a different page. This hold is empty paper, not a product.

Print empty. Print developing, not published. Wednesday is not a framework drop. A promised standard is not a posted PDF. Leave a named rulebook to the edition that owns a named rulebook.

Four days from incident report to Wednesday with no framework in sight. Working groups work slowly or not at all. The binder stays empty either way.

Four days deep in working-on; the verb hasn't changed. Unchanged verbs hold. The binder waits.

Waiting binders wait; Wednesday has no PDF. Four days from the incident report. Working-on is still the verb.

Wednesday's binder is empty. Working-on is still the verb. No PDF landed.

OpenAI has not published the misalignment-reporting framework it said it was building. TechCrunch confirmed the wiki incident; it did not attach a PDF. Four days after the report, no rulebook posted. Foldable pricing lives on another product page.
OpenAI has not published the framework. No PDF attached. Foldable pricing lives on another product page.

OpenAI has not published the framework. No PDF attached. Foldable pricing lives on another product page.

-- DAVID CHEN, San Francisco