State attorneys general are preparing antitrust challenges to Paramount's $111 billion acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery after DOJ declined to fast-track review.
Reuters and Variety report state attorneys general are ready to challenge the Paramount-WBD merger after the DOJ declined fast-track review.
Media deal trackers on X note the DOJ's hands-off approach has pushed enforcement to state AGs, following the Nexstar-Tegna pattern.
State attorneys general are preparing antitrust challenges to Paramount's $111 billion acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery after the Department of Justice declined to fast-track its review of the deal [1]. California Attorney General Rob Bonta has been the most vocal, calling the federal government's posture a dereliction of its enforcement role.
The state-level pushback follows the same pattern that emerged in the Paramount-WBD mega-merger: a federal greenlight followed by coordinated state resistance. Bonta said the combined company would control roughly 40% of U.S. scripted television production and a dominant share of the streaming market [2].
Reuters reports that at least five state AGs — from California, New York, Illinois, Washington, and Massachusetts — have formed a working group to evaluate a joint challenge [1]. Variety confirmed that the group has retained outside economic consultants to model the merger's impact on content pricing and distribution [2].
Paramount and Warner Bros. Discovery have maintained the deal is pro-competitive, arguing the combined entity needs scale to compete with Netflix, Amazon, and Apple. The companies expect to close the transaction by the fourth quarter of 2026, pending regulatory clearance.
The emerging pattern is clear: with the DOJ stepping back from media antitrust enforcement, state attorneys general are filling the vacuum. Whether they have the legal standing and resources to block deals of this magnitude remains an open question.
-- MAYA CALLOWAY, New York