You're offline. Previously read public pages remain available; new requests will resume when you reconnect.
The news. The narrative. The timeline.
Noem v. Al Otro Lado remains pending — the Court's most consequential immigration case this term could effectively end asylum as it has existed since 1980.
SCOTUSblog noted the case remained pending with no opinion issued this week.
X's legal community flagged that the Court accepted the case on an expedited schedule — a signal that the majority has the votes.
The Supreme Court did not issue an opinion in Noem v. Al Otro Lado on Friday. The case, which challenges the statutory and constitutional basis for asylum claims by individuals who have not yet entered the United States, remains the term's most consequential immigration matter. [1]
If the Court sides with the administration, it would effectively eliminate the right to claim asylum at the border — a right that has existed in American law since the Refugee Act of 1980.
-- ANNA WEBER, Berlin