Bangladesh still has a WHO outbreak map, not a parent service map, and the paper's Monday brief on WHO numbers without household guidance said surveillance numbers do not tell families where to obtain catch-up doses, which clinic is open, what papers to bring, or who answers when supplies run short.

WHO's disease-outbreak notice is the right public-health artifact for officials because it fixes the event inside the international disease-notification system, supplies country and outbreak context, and makes measles visible to global health readers who need comparable information across borders [1].

A parent, however, does not need an international notice first; a parent needs the district clinic, the eligibility rule, the dose schedule, the opening hours, the transport reality, the catch-up route for missed children, and the name of the authority accountable if stock is absent or a queue turns families away.

That is the divergence: X wants the outbreak to stand as proof of procurement collapse, mainstream health language can turn it into a risk bulletin, and the paper's position has not moved because an outbreak response becomes accountable only when families can act, officials can be named, and public maps turn into household instructions.

The next useful document would therefore be local, not global: a clinic roster, catch-up schedule, mobile-team route, school notice, hotline, or district stock report that tells a parent what to do before the next exposure.

-- PRIYA SHARMA, Delhi