Isabel Schnabel, the German member of the European Central Bank's Executive Board, told an audience in London on Thursday that the risk of higher euro-area inflation "has increased in recent weeks" and that the recent surge in fuel prices "may feed through the economy faster than during the last inflation surge in 2021-22 because memories of that painful inflation episode are still fresh." [1] Markets now price three or, more likely, four ECB rate hikes over the next twelve months, lifting the deposit rate from the current 2.00% to 2.75-3.00%. [1] April Eurozone CPI held at 3.0% with energy at +10.9% — the highest energy print since February 2023.
The May 7 paper opened the file on the ECB's "dominant risk" framing of the Iran war and the broken-glide energy passthrough. Today's standard advances to a named hike path. Schnabel's "this risk has increased" sentence is the most hawkish signal from a sitting ECB board member since the cycle's last hike in 2024. The speech text, published on the ECB website, opened the institutional door her colleagues had been holding ajar. [2] She said: "If the energy price shock broadens, monetary policy will need to tighten to contain the risk of second-round effects threatening medium-term price stability." [1]
The Bundesbank-tradition voice on the ECB board naming the hike path matters institutionally. Schnabel has historically operated as the Governing Council's hawkish anchor, the voice that pushed the 2022-2023 cycle of rate increases earlier than President Christine Lagarde's preferred pace. Her Thursday speech places her ahead of the institutional consensus on tightening — which has, by this read, now caught up with her. Reuters reported Schnabel was "joining a host of fellow rate-setters in backing likely rate hikes, probably as soon as June." [1] Politico's Wednesday read of the April 30 Governing Council meeting had already noted Lagarde's "moving away from the baseline" line and ING's Carsten Brzeski reading a "clear hiking bias to its wait-and-see approach." [3]
The price-pricing-channel mechanics Schnabel described are the live transmission case. She said a "growing share" of euro-area companies are planning to increase prices despite subdued demand and that households have raised their inflation expectations. [1] The corporate-pricing intentions data is the ECB's leading indicator on second-round effects. If firms are signalling forward price increases without demand support, the cost-pressure pass-through into the consumer basket is operative. The household-expectations data is the second indicator: anchored expectations are what give the central bank room to look through energy shocks. Unanchored expectations require a policy response.
Friday's Hormuz fire moves the ECB's adverse-scenario oil assumptions ($119) and severe-scenario oil assumptions ($145) closer to the live tape. Brent settled $102 Thursday and bid up Friday on the kinetic exchange. The March three-scenario projection had a baseline at $81 Brent producing 2026 inflation at 2.4%, an adverse scenario at $119 producing inflation at 3.1%, and a severe scenario at $145 producing inflation at 4.0%. April's 3.0% headline already runs above the March baseline. The bank is no longer reading from the optimistic page.
The wage tracker is the load-bearing data point through June. The ECB's wage-expectations surveys still indicate easing labour costs through 2026. [4] If June wage negotiations or July prints break that assumption, the second-round case for a hike strengthens further. Schnabel addressed the fiscal-side prerequisite directly: she "appealed to governments and lawmakers to do their part in taming inflation, urging them to put public debt on a sustainable footing and to preserve the prudential rules put in place after the financial crisis." [1] The institutional concern she named — fiscal dominance progressively eroding monetary-policy space — is the architecture's permanent worry.
The cross-country numbers from April's flash print remain the structural base. Spain printed 3.5%, Italy 2.9%, Germany 2.9%, France 2.5%. The shock is hitting the bloc as a single shock with similar amplitude in each capital. The ECB's "dominant risk" framing acknowledges that uniformity. The hike path Schnabel named on Thursday treats the uniformity as policy-relevant.
Two calendar markers run inside the next month. The June 5 Governing Council meeting is where Schnabel's "increased risk" framing meets the rate decision. The OPEC+ JTC June 7 communiqué follows two days later. If June produces a hike, the cycle's first move comes in week one of summer. The eurozone stagflation conversation, which Lagarde dismissed at the April 30 press conference as a "lower growth" framing rather than stagnation, will be relitigated if April's energy print holds into May. [4]
The 12-15-year enrichment moratorium that the U.S.-Iran MOU contemplates does not deliver back the 10.9% April energy print. The ECB has to act on the print before any Iran deal can ease the shock. June 5 is where that decision lands. Markets, on Schnabel's "memories... are still fresh" line, have already started pricing the path.
-- HENDRIK VAN DER BERG, Brussels