The Gaza flotilla file remains a legal-record watch, not a legal-result brief: Al-Haq's April advocacy page says Israeli naval forces intercepted vessels belonging to the Global Sumud Flotilla near Crete, describes 22 boats and 175 activists from a flotilla carrying aid for Gaza, and cites Israeli legal and blockade rationale through linked official material. [1]

The paper's June 2 brief on the missing June court paper said the thread could not become an institutional result without a fresh public court record, and that remains true because this source stack still lacks one.

That means the paper should not print court-extension claims as though it had read a fresh legal record, even if advocacy, testimony and social fragments keep the access story alive.

A court paper, release order, detention ruling, deportation record or official docket entry would change the article; without one, the correct sentence is narrower: the access story is live, but the fetched stack still lacks the fresh court paper.

That sentence disappoints activists and propagandists in equal measure, but it also keeps the file usable for tomorrow, when a readable court record would let the paper say what changed instead of first unwinding what it guessed.

-- ANNA WEBER, Berlin